tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30501448.post4245568153283401745..comments2008-01-11T10:30:12.796-02:00Claudia Cerasohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09303462904334693919noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30501448.post-82438339995652696342008-01-10T23:02:00.000-02:002008-01-10T23:02:00.000-02:00Dear Claudia, you have found the exact idea to describe Twitter... it is like stream of consciousness literature... the reader has to make out the message, the idea...I still find it difficult to get accustomed to twittering...nevertheless, it calls my attention.Prof. Nelba Quintana- La Plata- Argentinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04033656848787372035noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30501448.post-42583283296003730652007-11-27T15:13:00.000-03:002007-11-27T15:13:00.000-03:00I don't know what you think after reading this. I think I would like a 'Twitter reaction' widget in my blog.<BR/><BR/>Not sure about the feasibility of such widget, though. Perhaps with some syntax similar to the @user.<BR/><BR/>But... <BR/>I wonder whether people would choose to 'direct tweet' their reactions. Twitter has the secrecy or whispered effect of a backchannel as opposed to blog posts, i.e intentionally published thoughts.<BR/><BR/>Whenever I tweet, I am well aware that post of mine has a unique URL, therefore, it is public and quotable (with or without context. <BR/><BR/>Would somebody mind their tweets being quoted? How is the padlock reinterpreted here? Can I quote you if you use a padlock?<BR/>These new permeable boundaries are both, puzzling and fascinating to me.Claudia Cerasohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09303462904334693919noreply@blogger.com