« Home | Dr Bob Marzano CUE 2009 Keynote Part II - Assessme... » | Dr Bob Marzano CUE 2009 Keynote Part l - Education... » | Writing in the 21st Century » | Time to Resist » | Cn EdubloggerCon Chat » | Brave New Tech » | Suburban Bloggers » | When Blogging is Born » | Teacher Interpreters » | Twitter4Skype »

LinkedIn Networked Learning


I asked a question within LinkedIn Answers. I let people know I would re-share answers openly in my blog, so here is my little analysis and synthesis of the learning.
For those with a LinkedIn account, the full conversation is here.

Question:
Are there examples of LinkedIn used for educational purposes?

I would like to know if anyone has created a LinkedIn profile or group to either use it as a platform or an online support to any kind of formal training session. If so, how successful was it? I am interested in pedagogical implications on the use of a social network tool like LinkedIn. ideas and results of this will be published in my blog ELT Notes. http://eltnotes.blogspot.com Thank you.

Now, I have been bookmarking countless tools bloggers and open media lovers have explored and reviewed to weigh their networking and conversation carrier potential. You may be wondering why I posed a question on a closed forum like LinkedIn?

Two simple reasons
.
1) Learning happens where people are striking up conversations. There certainly is a lot of learning going on in there. I wonder how people experience it.

2) The idea of diverse networking
This requires more than 140 characters to explain.
The scenario is complex
-Different online venues for conversation
-Different people, varied educational background, geography, mother tongues.

For my network not to become closed or a replica of my Twitter contacts inside LinkedIn groups, I necessarily need to reach people far and wide with my question if I am to obtain something different to challenge my thinking. I think there is a vast majority of non-blogging experts busily learning there: 35 million+ people. I wonder what proportion makes use of the Answers feature. Still, too much expertise to leave out of my PLE.

The answers
How people who answered view LinkedIn:
  • A social platform with tremendous networking and learning possibilities.
  • A place not only to read but to contribute.
  • A place to ask your questions where help is pretty much guaranteed and fast.
  • A platform where lots of informal learning happens.

Dear co-bloggers, please re-read the bullets.
Done?
OK. I agree and suspect none of us would describe LinkedIn as such a tool or place.

Jay Cross quotes from an email he received,
[...] I am an active FaceBook user (but only with friends and family) and am making more use of LinkedIn, but I don't find either particularly effective in supporting my learning or the small circles of people that I learn with. Am I missing something? [...]
Then Jay answers,
Most of what we learn, we learn from other people.
You say apps like LinkedIn don't add much to your learning, yet you contacted me through LinkedIn and I hope the connection adds to your learning.

We would certainly hurry in a hello wave to say that Twitter is precisely the place where networking and informal learning can actually happen.

Now, regardless of the results we can obtain if we compare LinkedIn to, say, Ning, isn't the attitude LinkedIn active users reveal in those answers what we would like our students to grasp? The very attitude towards the web and networking activity that underpins every literacy definition we sketch?

Fine. Well, many people within LinkedIn have that attitude.

Question
How many of us are thinking of exploiting the expertise that can come into and out of our classrooms aided by LinkedIn?

Please point me to examples you may have or know of.

Open to be answered in LinkedIn for 7 more days. Open here for the life of Blogger and beyond.















Marginally relevant. Some technical aspects
(if you are familiar with LinkedIn, skip this)
LinkedIn platform has several opportunities for conversation:
-private- contact to contact. Possibilities increase in this direction only if you upgrade your service.
-private within a circle, i.e. a group. You need to be approved by the owner or managers.
-Open. Anyone with an account can ask and answer all questions posed.

Some drawbacks
-The question expires after a few days. You may extend the expiry date.
-Questions are grouped under generic subject lines. Then the machine ranks latest on top of the list. No further organisation possible.
-Search engine for answers section only is available. I believe results show only the questions that are still open. So archiving learning conversations will not happen unless you link elsewhere.









Labels: , ,

While trying to have a conversation there, I accidentally discovered that my answer to one of the participants goes privately and will not appear in the thread as a conversation. Group discussions allow that.

This is my answer to Scott Cunningham:

Definitely the platform was made for networking not for teaching. Connection strength can increase in here.

When I first posed the question, I was wondering why not republish here questions that may come up in the middle of a presentation. That is, if you are presenting, why not pull the connections from your network and beyond to take some part in the debate.

I'll give more thought to the group idea you mention. Thank you.

Claudia, I found some LinkedIn groups with target people I couldn't find anywhere else.

That's the whole point, Eduardo. Asking questions where people are.

Post a Comment

Links to this post

Create a Link

Links

Meta

Visits since July 2006:

Copyright ©2006-2010. Claudia Ceraso. All rights reserved.
  • My Blogger Profile
  • Subscribe to this blog's feed
    [What is this?]